Cases 1 - 10 of 14
HARNEY v. HORTH et al
as 2:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Respondent:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARIES F. MILLER, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARNEY v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Defendant:
ZACHARY SCHULTZ, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead v. Prentice et al
as 1:2021cv01149
Defendant:
Garbe, J Berry, . Sartain and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherrod v. Anglin et al
as 1:2021cv01087
Defendant:
Doug Stephens, Rob Jeffreys, Josh Anglin and others
Plaintiff:
Joe N Sherrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv01138
Plaintiff:
Rebecca J. Berry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Tracey Berry, et al v. David Snyders, et al
as 16-3785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACEY J. BERRY and KELLIE ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID SNYDERS, Sheriff of Stephenson County, Individually and in his official capacity, DEAN SCHROEDER, Stephenson County Jail Superintendent, individually and in his official capacity, DARRELL WRIGHT and others
Osbaldo v. Harrington et al
as 3:2015cv01174
Plaintiff:
Jose-Nicolas Osbaldo
Defendant:
William D Qualls and Nathan J. Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry et al v. Snyders et al.
as 3:2015cv50239
Plaintiff:
Tracey J. Berry and Kellie Anderson
Defendant:
David Snyders, Dean Schroeder, Darrell Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osbaldo v. Berry et al
as 3:2015cv00964
Plaintiff:
Jose-Nicolas Osbaldo
Defendant:
Nathan J. Berry, Robert E. Hughes, Jason N. Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Prentice et al
as 1:2015cv01248
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
S Prentice, Randy Pfister, B Schmeltz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
