Cases 1 - 10 of 13
LANE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
BOBIE J. LANE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Lane
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones, Leroy v. Foster, Brian et al
as 3:2019cv00106
Defendant:
John Ruffin, Gwendlyn A. Vick, Amy Gundreson and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy S. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Spiller et al
as 3:2015cv01077
Plaintiff:
Aaron Miller
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc, C Brown, Dr Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COX et al v. CA HOLDING INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01754
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BROWN, LUCINDA COX, DEVIN HARLEY and others
Defendant:
CA HOLDING INC., CACH LLC, CACH OF NJ LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FTC v. Kevin Trudeau, et al
as 13-1746
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN TRUDEAU
Respondent - Appellant:
WINSTON & STRAWN and LAW OFFICE OF MARC J. LANE PC
Carter, Jackie v. Morgan, D. et al
as 3:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jackie Carter
Defendant:
D. Morgan , Lillian Tenebruso , J. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. J Lane Trucking Inc
as 3:2010mc00025
Plaintiff:
Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
J Lane Trucking Inc
Central States Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. J. Lane Trucking, Inc.
as 1:2010cv02366
Plaintiff:
Central States Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
J. Lane Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
