Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marcel Roundtree v. Warren Krueger, et al
as 11-2638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCEL NMN ROUNDTREE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN W. KRUEGER, VALLERY J. KRUEGER, RICHARD A. DAILE, Judge and others
Roundtree v. Krueger et al
as 1:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
Marcel NMN Roundtree
Defendant:
Warren W Krueger, Vallery Joy Krueger, Richard A Daile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kubota Tractor Corporation et al v. Payne
as 1:2010cv01229
Plaintiff:
Kubota Tractor Corporation and Kubota Credit Corporation, U.S.A.
Defendant:
James A Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
C. H., et al v. Indiana Department of Family, et al
as 10-1394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
C. H., R. H., T. S. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and JAMES W. PAYNE, Director, Indiana Department of Child Services
ROBERTSON v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2008cv01279
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN D. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
MITCH DANIELS, ATTORNEY GENERAL STEVE CARTER and JAMES W. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adria Deaton-Gray v. Marilyn Moores
as 08-2941
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIA DEATON-GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCH DANIELS, Governor, STEVE CARTER, Attorney General, JAMES W. PAYNE, Director of DCS and others
DEATON-GRAY v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2008cv00479
Plaintiff:
ADRIA DEATON-GRAY
Defendant:
GOVERNOR MITCH DANIELS, ATTORNEY GENERAL STEVE CARTER, JAMES W. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEATON v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA DEATON
Defendant:
GOVERNOR MITCH DANIELS, ATTORNEY GENERAL STEVE CARTER, JAMES W. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rangel et al v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
Adrian Garcia Rangel and Janell Allane Rangel
Defendant:
Chris Reynolds, Chris Reynolds, Donella Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
