Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Townsend v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, James D. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry Johnson v. Gary Feinerman
as 19-2180
Interested Party:
THOMAS J. DART, STEVE JAROSZ, Officer, Officer, Star # 6803, a city employee, KIMBERLY M. FOXX and others
Respondent:
GARY FEINERMAN, United States District Court Judge
Petitioner:
JERRY V. JOHNSON
Jerry Johnson v. City of Chicago
as 17-3262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY V. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation
Jerry Johnson v. Gary Feinerman
as 17-3026
Petitioner:
JERRY V. JOHNSON
Respondent:
GARY FEINERMAN, United States District Court Judge
Party-in-Interest:
CITY OF CHICAGO, A municipal corporation and STEVE JAROSZ, Officer, Officer, Star # 6803, a city employee
Jerry Johnson v. Nancy Berryhill
as 17-2350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY L. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Jerry Johnson v. City of Chicago, et al
as 16-3657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY V. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, A Municipal Corporation and STEVE JAROSZ, Officer, Officer, Star #6803, a City Employee
Jerry Johnson v. City of Chicago, et al
as 16-3521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY V. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation and STEVE JAROSZ, Officer, Star #6803, a City employee
Johnson v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2015cv07996
Plaintiff:
Jerry P Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Tom Dart and Toni Preckwrinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jerry Johnson
as 15-2394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JERRY D. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv02598
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
