Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gomez v. Rodarte et al
as 1:2020cv06051
Defendant:
Vincent Ryan, Officer Rodarte and Rodarte
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gomez v. Chicago Police Dept et al
as 1:2017cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gomez
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept, Officer Fonseca, Officer Renteria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank, successor in interest to Mid America Bank, fsb v. Gomez et al
as 1:2016cv03965
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank, successor in interest to Mid America Bank, fsb
Defendant:
Jose Jesus Gomez, Angelina Gomez and Juana Zarco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez v. Stroger Hospital et al
as 1:2015cv10338
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gomez
Defendant:
Stroger Hospital, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez et al v. Metropolitan Janitorial Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv50025
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gomez and Elizabeth Gomez
Defendant:
Metropolitan Janitorial Services, Inc. and Patricia Douglas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank, successor in interest to Mid America Bank, fsb v. Jose Jeses Gomez et al
as 1:2014cv07875
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank, successor in interest to Mid America Bank, fsb
Defendant:
Jose Jesus Gomez and Angelina Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Jesus Gomez-Lopez
as 14-2281
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS GOMEZ-LOPEZ
Gomez v. Hathaway et al
as 1:2010cv01587
Petitioner:
Jesus Gomez
Respondent:
Jody Hathaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
