Cases 1 - 10 of 8,858
Gress v. Klip-It LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04912
Plaintiff:
Dr. William P. Gress
Defendant:
Klip-It LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Span v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
Samuel Span
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, LaToya Hughes and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe et al v. Northwestern University
as 1:2024cv04831
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Defendant:
Northwestern University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Spencer v. Mock et al
as 1:2024cv04829
Plaintiff:
Cuddellous Spencer
Defendant:
Howard Mock, Sullivan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Kruger v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Joshua W Kruger
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Cheryl Hansen, Mindi Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trainauskas v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Brian Trainauskas
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv04767
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Titus v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, Brittany Greene, Tara Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birdo v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Kevin Birdo
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Kimberly Gibson, Aaron Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jasso v. Little et al
as 4:2024cv04101
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Jasso
Defendant:
Roy Little, Alexander Stuart, Jamar A Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
