Cases 1 - 10 of 32
PAYNE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY L. PAYNE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Payne v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq01586
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Payne
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Maurice Payne
as 22-1117
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE L. PAYNE
PAYNE v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00945
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2017cv00404
Defendant:
JUSTIN COLE, SUZI DIEHL, ENITH GREEN and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02123
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAYNE v. PARKE COUNTY SHERIFF JUSTIN COLE
as 2:2017cv00102
Defendant:
CHARLES BOLINGER, CITY OF ROCKVILLE, IND., JUSTIN COLE and others
Respondent:
PARKE COUNTY SHERIFF JUSTIN COLE
Petitioner:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maurice Payne v. USA
as 16-3660
Petitioner - Appellant:
MAURICE L. PAYNE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Payne
as 1:2016cv04306
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Maurice L Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
