Cases 1 - 10 of 1,346
Lilly v. Spiegel et al
as 3:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Lilly
Defendant:
Craig Spiegel, SSM HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP and SSM HEALTH DEPAUL HOSPITAL
Other:
Nicole Laux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Eli Lilly & Company, et al v. Monica Richards
as 24-8017
Petitioner:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Respondent:
MONICA RICHARDS, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals
Ronald Streck v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 24-1884
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. STRECK, STATE OF NEW YORK and STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
CELLA v. LILLY USA LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CELLA
Defendant:
LILLY USA LLC and THE LILLY SEVERANCE PAYMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Igwe v. Macon County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv02071
Plaintiff:
Daniel Igwe
Defendant:
Macon County Sheriff's Office, Brad Patient, Joseph Pearcy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Potiyevskiy v. Toma, et al.
as 1:2024cv02612
Plaintiff:
ARKADIY POTIYEVSKIY
Defendant:
Lilly Toma and Prymor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Lyons v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00921
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Lillie Lyons
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronald Streck v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 24-1352
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. STRECK, STATE OF NEW YORK and STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Powell v. Gas House et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Bonita Powell
Defendant:
Don The Gas House, Nick, Lillie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fults, Nathan v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 3:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Nathan Fults
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
