Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Bralen Jordan v. Johnny Leonwicsy, et al
as 22-2832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNNY LEONWICSY, Captain, KENNETH DUGDALE, C. HORST and others
Bralen Jordan v. Johnny Leonwicsy, et al
as 22-2741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNNY LEONWICSY, Captain, KENNETH DUGDALE, C. HORST and others
Jordan v. Leonwicsy et al
as 3:2022cv50288
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Defendant:
Johnny Leonwicsy, Kenneth Dugdale, C. Horst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez et al v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv01720
Defendant:
Tyler Fokas (#19036), The City of Chicago, Daanish Waudiwala (#19418) and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Delgado and Leslie Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bralen Jordan v. Kathleen Sawyer, et al
as 20-2954
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE EBBERTS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Director of Operations/Custody, KATHLEEN H. SAWYER, Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Moon v. Schreiber et al
as 3:2020cv00880
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Harley G Lappin, Andre Matevousian and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01984
Defendant:
Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ramarize, Cruize and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Defendant:
. Ramarize, Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Gavin et al
as 1:2019cv03282
Defendant:
Sgt. Dellis, Sgt. Lappine, Deputy Gaudrama and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lappin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv01295
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Julia M. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
