Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13876
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
YARBROUGH v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03238
Plaintiff:
REGINALD LAVAN YARBROUGH
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levan Galleries LLC v. City of Chicago, et al
as 19-1709
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WILLIAMS, TIMOTHY J. FLISK, TIMOTHY E. CERVEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVAN GALLERIES LLC and JEMAL LAVAN HANCOCK
Jemal Hancock, et al v. Sotheby's Incorporated, et al
as 19-1144
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN DOLLER, SOTHEBY'S, formerly known as SOTHEBY'S HOLDINGS INCORPORATED and SOTHEBY'S INCORPORATED
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVAN GALLERIES LLC and JEMAL LAVAN HANCOCK
Hancock et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv04580
Defendant:
Officer Tre Hardiman, City Of Chicago Police Department, City Of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
LAVAN GALLERIES LLC and JEMAL LAVAN HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock et al v. Sotheby's Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07446
Plaintiff:
Jemal Lavan Hancock and Lavan Galleries LLC
Defendant:
Sotheby's Inc. , Sotheby's Holdings, Inc. and Benjamin Doller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hancock et al v. Sotheby's Holdings Inc.
as 1:2017cv04556
Plaintiff:
Jemal Lavan Hancock and Levan Galleries LLC
Defendant:
Sotheby's Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bullard et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company et al
as 1:2007cv06883
Plaintiff:
Virda Bell Bullard, John G. Alexander, Clarence Edward Batts, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, Koppers Industries, Inc., Koppers Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
