Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Unite Here Health et al v. I.L. Creation of Maryland, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00885
Plaintiff:
UNITE HERE Health and Matthew Walker
Defendant:
Christine Choi, I.L. Creation of Maryland, Inc. a Maryland corporation, d/b/a ITLC-LOC, Inc., Steve Choi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Priority Physicians, Inc. v. Gruszka et al
as 1:2013cv02938
Plaintiff:
Priority Physicians, Inc.
Defendant:
Dan Gruszka and Confidential MD, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
The Paul H. Shield, MD Inc. Money Purchase Plan et al v. Gould et al
as 1:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
The Paul H. Shield, MD Inc. Money Purchase Plan and The Paul H. Shield, MD Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant:
Steven Gould , Marc Doubleday , George Hides and others
Trustee:
Walker Nell Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Paul H. Shield MD Inc. Profit, et al v. Northfield Laboratories Inc., et al
as 10-8020
Petitioner:
PAUL H. SHIELD MD INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN, PAUL H. SHIELD MD INC. MONEY PURCHASE PLAN, ALAN GOODMAN and others
Respondent:
NORTHFIELD LABORATORIES INC., STEVEN A. GOULD and RICHARD E. DEWOSKIN
Unomedical A/S v. Smiths Medical MD Inc.
as 1:2009cv04375
Plaintiff:
Unomedical A/S and Unomedical A/S
Defendant:
Smiths Medical MD Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Eisenberg v. MDS Inc
as 1:2008cv06082
Plaintiff:
Robert S Eisenberg and Robert S Eisenberg
Defendant:
MDS Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MDS INC. et al v. COVANCE INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00455
Plaintiff:
MDS INC., MDS INC., MDS INC. and others
Defendant:
COVANCE INC., COVANCE INC., NIGEL BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Levis v. MDS, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01744
Plaintiff:
Juanita Levis, Juanita Levis and Juanita Levis
Defendant:
MDS, Inc., MDS, Inc. and MDS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
