Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Scott v. Does
as 2:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Michael G Scott
Defendant:
John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. State of Wisconsin Division of Hearing and Appeals et al
as 2:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Michael G Scott
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Division of Hearing and Appeals, Christine L Hansen, Andrew Riedmaier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott Jr v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2021cv01998
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzker, Paul Hasting LLP, Service List and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrance Scott Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott, Jr. v. State of Illinois Cook County Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv01026
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrance Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Illinois Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Vargas et al
as 3:2020cv50045
Defendant:
Michael D Scott, Roderek Mattreks, A Butaled and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Mount et al
as 3:2018cv01843
Defendant:
C.O. Ewing, Travis Allen, Capt. Mount and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Mount et al
as 1:2018cv05816
Defendant:
C.O. Ewing, C.O. Haynes, Capt. Mount and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Peterson et al
as 2:2018cv01163
Defendant:
CO Donnell, Ms Peterson, J Perttu and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott and Michael G Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michael J Scott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pablo Torres-Flores v. Michael Scott
as 18-2287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PABLO TORRES-FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. SCOTT, Medical Director, Pinckneyville Correctional Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
