Cases 1 - 10 of 38
McCaskill et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq00596
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Jimmy McCaskill and Tresa McCaskill
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCaskill v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01557
Plaintiff:
Armintha McCaskill
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Softsheen-Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCaskill et al v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv14059
Plaintiff:
Erika McCaskill and Shatara Brooks
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
McCaskill et al v. American Public Defense Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05097
Defendant:
Ernest Jackson, Valencia Brown, Lewis Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Carlitos McTizic and Bryson McCaskill
MCCASKILL v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv04763
Plaintiff:
SHAWNA MCCASKILL
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Denean Adams v. Board of Education Harvey Scho, et al
as 19-3269
Defendant / Appellee:
LINDA HAWKINS, BETTY JOHNSON, BOARD OF EDUCATION HARVEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 152 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENEAN ADAMS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Denean Adams v. Board of Education Harvey Scho, et al
as 19-2534
Defendant / Appellant:
BOARD OF EDUCATION HARVEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 152, BETTY JOHNSON, GLORIA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DENEAN ADAMS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCaskill v. Moore et al
as 1:2017cv07082
Plaintiff:
Kisha McCaskill
Defendant:
Barbara Moore, Stafford Owens, Lina Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
