Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Olmstead Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant:
Olmstead Construction, Inc., Daniel Olmstead and Matthew Olmstead doing business as Olmstead Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Ackley et al v. Yes To, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01823
Plaintiff:
Ackley, Tammy Gerkin, Crystal Benefiel and others
Defendant:
Yes To, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Champaign County, Illinois et al
as 2:2019cv02346
Defendant:
. Gupta, . Casey, . Olmstead and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emers v. Olmstead et al
as 2:2018cv02045
Plaintiff:
Lyarron T Emers
Defendant:
Brett Olmstead, Julia Rietz, Robert Dustin Sumption and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Champaign Police Department
as 2:2015cv02271
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Butler
Defendant:
Champaign Police Department, Kevin Olmstead and David Griffet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Olmstead
as 2:2015cv02116
Plaintiff:
Darmel L Smith
Defendant:
Kevin Olmstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv08745
Plaintiff:
Jamell Olmstead Malone
Defendant:
The City of Chicago and Chicago Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malone v. Chicago Police Department
as 1:2013cv04906
Plaintiff:
Jamell Olmstead Malone
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malone v. Cintron
as 1:2013cv04845
Plaintiff:
Jamell Olmstead Malone
Defendant:
Cintron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
