Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wallace v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv12690
Plaintiff: Christi P Wallace
Defendant: Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC., Revlon, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wallace v. Hepp
as 1:2017cv01321
Petitioner: E P Wallace
Respondent: Warden Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace et al v. Grosboll et al
as 3:2016cv03006
Plaintiff: Stephen P Wallace and State of Illinois
Defendant: Carolyn Taft Grosboll, Defendants 1-10 of Record and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
State of Illinois et al v. Grosboll et al
as 1:2015cv11268
Plaintiff: State Of Illinois and Stephen P Wallace
Defendant: Carolyn Taft Grosboll, James J Murphy, Thomas Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Illinois et al v. Grosboll et al
as 1:2015cv01486
Plaintiff: State of Illinois and Stephen P Wallace
Defendant: Carolyn Taft Grosboll, James J Murphy, Thomas Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Wallace v. Executive Committee of the Uni
as 15-1168
Petitioner: STEPHEN P. WALLACE
Respondent: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
E. Wallace v. Lizzie Tegels
as 14-2774
Petitioner: E. P. WALLACE
Respondent: LIZZIE TEGELS, Warden
Wallace v. Tegels We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00439
Petitioner: E P Wallace
Respondent: Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
E. Wallace v. Randall Hepp
as 12-3623
Petitioner - Appellant: E. P. WALLACE
Respondent - Appellee: RANDALL HEPP
Wallace v. Hepp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00360
Petitioner: E P Wallace
Respondent: Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?