Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TRAVIS v. PYKE et al
as 1:2020cv01121
Defendant:
CARPENTER, PYKE, DONALDSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAIME ANDREW TRAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis v. Pyke et al
as 3:2020cv00300
Defendant:
Carpenter, Pyke, Donaldson and others
Plaintiff:
Jaime Andrew Travis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMLET v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 2:2017cv00574
Defendant:
CITY CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, TERRY R. CURRY and others
Former Dep. Pro:
ABIGAIL GRANTSTEIN
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. HAMLET
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUST v. PYKE et al
as 1:2014cv00352
Defendant:
LAURA M. CLOUSER, THOMAS R LETT, NOLAN D. PYKE and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY LEE RUST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rust v. Pyke et al
as 2:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Rust
Defendant:
Nolan D Pyke, Laura M Clouser, Thomas R Lett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE NEW WASHINGTON STATE BANK v. PYKE et al
as 4:2010cv00038
Defendant:
B & J PRINTING, INC., CITIMORTGAGE, INC., INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff:
THE NEW WASHINGTON STATE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
BRYSON et al v. PYKE et al
as 4:2010cv00031
Plaintiff:
AUDRA BRYSON and DEBRA BRYSON
Defendant:
KENTUCKIANA CREMATION CENTRE and RICHARD PYKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
RICHARD PYKE v. LINK MANUFACTURING, LTD.
as 4:2008cv00120
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PYKE
Defendant:
LINK MANUFACTURING, LTD.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PYKE
as 4:2008mc00002
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
RICHARD D. PYKE
RUST v. CLOUSER et al
as 1:2008cv00151
Plaintiff:
RICKY LEE RUST
Defendant:
LAURA M. CLOUSER and NOLAN D. PYKE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
