Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Singleton v. R&L Carriers et al
as 1:2023cv03840
Plaintiff:
TANERAYA SINGLETON
Defendant:
R&L Carriers, Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. and Charles Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Barnes et al v. Greenwood Motor Lines Inc et al
as 3:2021cv03257
Plaintiff:
Barbara Barnes and John Bradley Barnes
Defendant:
Greenwood Motor Lines Inc, Christopher Michael Hegger, Greenwood Motor Lines Inc a Foreign Corporation doing business as R & L Carriers, Inc., d/b/a R + L Carriers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02910
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TERRELL v. R&L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv04276
Plaintiff:
MARK AND TERESA TERRELL, TERESA TERRELL and MARK TERRELL
Defendant:
R&L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC and CANNON COCHRAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sturgis v. R+L Carriers Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00440
Plaintiff:
Barbara Sturgis
Defendant:
R+L CARRIERS INC., GREENWOOD MOTOR LINES, INC., R+L TRANSFER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Robles v. R&L Carriers
as 1:2010cv05887
Plaintiff:
Jose Robles
Defendant:
R&L Carriers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
