Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DEAN V. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv03340
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL R. DEAN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jason Myers v. Paul Mathias, et al
as 15-3616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON T. MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL D. MATHIAS, in his official capacity, MARGRET ROBB, in her official capacity, STATE OF INDIANA, in all their official capacities and others
Jason Myers v. Paul Mathias, et al
as 15-3266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON T. MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL D. MATHIAS, in his official capacity, MARGRET ROBB, in her official capacity, STATE OF INDIANA, in all their official capacities and others
Myers v Dean et al
as 4:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jason Tye Myers
Defendant:
Paul D Mathias, Margret Robb, State of Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYERS v. DEAN et al
as 1:2015cv00829
Defendant:
CALE J. BRADFORD, JONATHAN R. DEAN, GREGORY J. DONAT and others
Plaintiff:
JASON TYE MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Dean v. Ron Neal
as 15-1802
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY R. DEAN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RON NEAL, Superintendent
Lucian Dean v. Carolyn Colvin
as 13-3627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUCIAN R. DEAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
DEAN v. BUTTS
as 1:2013cv01082
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
LARRY R. DEAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEAN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00474
Plaintiff:
LUCIAN R. DEAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Morgan v. PI & I Motor Express, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv05787
Plaintiff:
Helen Elaine Morgan
Defendant:
PI & I Motor Express, Inc, PI & I Motor Express, Inc and Keith R. Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
