Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Spearman v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10290
Plaintiff:
Denisha Spearman
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Garner v. Sheriff Key, et al
as 22-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF KEY, Lake County, (Badge #488), PEGGY KATONA, Lake County Treasurer, RICHARD J. DAWSON, Attorney and others
Garner v. Key et al
as 2:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Key, Peggy Katona, Richard James Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Garner v. Peggy Katona, et al
as 22-2495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
PEGGY KATONA, JOHN PETALAS, RICHARD J. DAWSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garner v. McDermott et al
as 2:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Thomas McDermott, Lia Dawson, Richard James Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Streight v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2021cv50339
Plaintiff:
Caleb James Quincy Streight
Defendant:
Jay Robert Pritzker, Rock Valley College, Howard J. Spearman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Katona et al
as 2:2021cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Peggy Katona, John Petalas, Richard James Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEARMAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv06139
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
ERNESTINE SPEARMAN and MICHAEL SPEARMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
