Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Washington v. Aramark
as 3:2026cv50315
Plaintiff:
Eugene Steven Washington
Defendant:
Aramark
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Appellant Defenders
as 3:2026cv03237
Plaintiff:
Steven James
Defendant:
Appellant Defenders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NANCE v. JACKSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2026cv00191
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW STEVEN NANCE
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY JAIL, JAIL STAFF and MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2026cv08666
Plaintiff:
Steven Boyd
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Donnell Owens, Mamadou Diarra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. BILL et al
as 1:2026cv01515
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
BILL, BURRIS and HOLLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENO v. HENDERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2026cv01520
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DENO
Defendant:
HENDERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and HENDERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER MEDICAL (WESTERN KENTUCKY CORRECTIONAL CARE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart Bey v. Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2026cv00331
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Stewart Bey
Defendant:
Sheriff Department, Troy Hershberger, Indiana State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barrett v. Rozmarynoski et al
as 2:2026cv01251
Plaintiff:
Carl Barrett
Defendant:
Tonia Doris Rozmarynoski, Christopher Stevens, Jodi Perttu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stefannie Dyson v. Steven Klimek, et al
as 26-2492
Plaintiff:
STEFANNIE DYSON
Defendant:
STEVEN KLIMEK, JANE DOES, ROXANE BOUTTE and others
Mills v. Stevens Transport Inc et al
as 2:2026cv02222
Plaintiff:
Michael Mills
Defendant:
Stevens Transport Inc and Ayed Kamil Abu-Ajameh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
