Cases 1 - 10 of 14,212
YARBROUGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
ANTWAINE ENTA YARBROUGH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jeremiah Farmer v. USA
as 24-2002
Petitioner:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
EVERWISE CREDIT UNION v. KISTHART et al
as 1:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
EVERWISE CREDIT UNION
Defendant:
MATTHEW KISTHART, MEDITERRANEAN GYRO PRODUCTS, INC., MEDITTERRANEAN GYRO PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Heather Schroeder, et al v. Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, et al
as 24-1559
Plaintiff:
HEATHER SCHROEDER and MISTY TANNER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE PALOVERDE INSURANCE COMPANY and PROGRESSIVE SOUTHEASTERN INSURANCE CO.
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION
Robert L. Berrios v. USA
as 24-1965
Petitioner:
ROBERT L. BERRIOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Khalil M Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walker v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00701
Petitioner:
Lamont D Walker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Labra v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04626
Plaintiff:
Michelle Labra
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Franshon Stapleton v. USA
as 24-1563
Petitioner:
FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N., also known as CHRIS, also known as FRANSOHN STAPLETON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
