Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
COOK GROUP INCORPORATED v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING MEMBER BEING AXA XL SYNDICATE LIMITED (2003), F/K/A CATLIN SYNDICATE LIMITED (2003)
as 1:2024cv01647
Plaintiff: COOK GROUP INCORPORATED
Defendant: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING MEMBER BEING AXA XL SYNDICATE LIMITED (2003), F/K/A CATLIN SYNDICATE LIMITED (2003)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
MYERS et al v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON
as 1:2024cv00976
Defendant: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON
Plaintiff: DR. WOODROW A. MYERS and STACY MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. 00001SIM-220 et al v. Imperial Crane Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01037
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. 00001SIM-220, Chaucer Syndicate 1084 and Beazley Syndicate 3623
Defendant: Imperial Crane Services, Inc. and Bohne Crane Rental & Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. SFV Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02278
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Defendant: SFV Logistics LLC, Maruichi Leavitt Pipe & Tube LLC, Michael A Bartkus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Who Subscribe to Certificate No IRPI-AML-22-055 v. Cater Transport Services, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00310
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Who Subscribe to Certificate No IRPI-AML-22-055
Defendant: Cater Transport Services, LLC, Cater Transport, LLC, Cater Transportation Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
BEST INN MIDWEST, LLC v. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01586
Plaintiff: BEST INN MIDWEST, LLC
Defendant: UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy No. 50017200120 v. Stonegate Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv01908
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy No. 50017200120
Defendant: Stonegate Insurance Company, Producer's National Corporation, Q West d/b/a Q Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Wabash National Corporation v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
as 4:2022cv00023
Plaintiff: Wabash National Corporation
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Labrenz v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. BRT3A002360-02, Lloyd's Syndicate 2987 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01793
Counter Defendant: Trent Labrenz
Plaintiff: Mr Trent Labrenz
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. BRT3A002360-02, Lloyd's Syndicate 2987, Dennis Jones dba Eagle Window & Siding, Eagle Window & Siding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. BRT3A002360-02, Lloyd's Syndicate 2987 v. Dennis Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01217
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. BRT3A002360-02, Lloyd's Syndicate 2987
Defendant: Dennis Jones dba Eagle Window & Siding, Jacob M. Sitze, Trent Labrenz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?