Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dianne Kampinen v. COMM, et al
as 20-2855
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, STEVEN DILLINGHAM, WILLIAM ROSS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIANNE KAMPINEN
Stevens v. Broadcasting Board of Governors et al
as 1:2018cv05391
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs and Enforcement, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Department of State and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stevens
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Dianne Kampinen v. COMM, et al
as 14-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANNE KAMPINEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, GARY LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, ROBERT GROVES, Census Bureau Director and others
HaNiyyah Ali v. Pentagon, et al
as 12-2667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HANIYYAH N. ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
PENTAGON, AT&T CORPORATION, (Illinois Bell), FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and others
Dianne Kampinen v. COMM, et al
as 11-2686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANNE KAMPINEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, GARY LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, ROBERT GROVES, Census Bureau Director and others
Watkins v. The Chicago Housing Authority et al
as 1:2011cv04966
Plaintiff:
Joseph Watkins
Defendant:
The Chicago Housing Authority, United States Department of Housing Urban Development , United States Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
