Cases 11 - 20 of 1,797
Yoram Razz v. State of Israel, et al
as 2:2024cv02114
Plaintiff:
Yoram Razz
Defendant:
Joseph Saunders, Jonathan Wear, State of Israel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Reynolds v. Johnson Regional Medical Center et al
as 2:2024cv02108
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wade Reynolds, II
Defendant:
County Clerk Michelle Frost, Johnson County Sheriff's Department, Johnson County, Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dudley v. Freedman et al
as 4:2024cv04088
Plaintiff:
Karanya Marquis Dudley
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, Judge W. Autrey, Matt Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities-Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe v. Marion County et al
as 3:2024cv03035
Defendant:
Jim Collins and Marion County
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
