Cases 61 - 70 of 1,757
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities-Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Smith v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 5:2023cv05223
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Carol Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Wealth Management/Arvest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Crowson v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv04112
Plaintiff:
Russell Crowson
Defendant:
John Doe, Michael Kramm and City of Texarkana, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattingly v. McCune et al
as 2:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Michael Mattingly
Defendant:
Judge Marc McCune, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and Public Defender Arron Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
