Cases 1 - 10 of 563
Kersh v. Phillips RS North America, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02066
Defendant:
Phillips RS North America, LLC doing business as Respironics Inc. formerly known as Respironics, Inc, Respironics, Inc and Phillips Holding USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ima Kersh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
McBride v. USA
as 1:2024cv01035
Petitioner:
Eddie Dean McBride
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. WalMart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05109
Plaintiff:
Insight Direct USA, Inc.
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Paul v. USA
as 2:2024cv02039
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paul v. USA
as 6:2024cv06041
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Presley v. USA
as 2:2024cv02031
Petitioner:
Brent Presley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ingram v. USA
as 6:2024cv06008
Petitioner:
Travis Lee Ingram
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cable Gain Services, LLC v. Cequel Communications, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv06114
Plaintiff:
Cable Gain Services, LLC
Defendant:
Cequel Communications, LLC doing business as Suddenlink Communications and Altice USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Melendrez v. USA
as 5:2023cv05237
Petitioner:
Rafael Melendrez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
