Cases 51 - 60 of 9,976
Eric Sorenson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1785
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson, also known as Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Department of Human Services, (DHS) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law and others
Joanthony Johnson v. Michele Buckner
as 24-1779
Plaintiff:
Joanthony Johnson
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Warden, SCCC
Gregory Bartunek v. United States
as 24-1738
Petitioner:
Gregory Bartunek
Respondent:
United States of America
Erik Becerra v. United States
as 24-1744
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America
Stephen Nicholl-Embree v. James George, et al
as 24-1743
Plaintiff:
Stephen Robert Nicholl-Embree, also known as Stephen Robert Stark
Defendant:
James George, Sargent, Beth Skinner, Director, Stephen Weis, Warden and others
Bobby Robertson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-1745
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, James Gibson, Warden, James Shipman, Deputy Warden, Varner Supermax and others
Arthur Lee, Jr. v. United States
as 24-1737
Petitioner:
Arthur Tyrone Lee, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1734
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Burgess v. State of Missouri, et al
as 24-1731
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Buchanan County, Missouri, City of St. Joseph, Missouri and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
