Cases 1 - 10 of 11
David James v. Michael Dukes, et al
as 23-2267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David N. James
Defendant / Appellee:
M. Dukes, Officer/Deputy, Lonoke County Jail & Courts (originally named as M. Dukes), Tomas Johnson, Jail Deputy (Officer in Charge), Lonoke County Jail (Originally named Johnson) and Barbria Elmore, Circuit Court Judge, Lonoke County Court
Zachariah Dambrosia-Shaw v. Robert Wakefield, et al
as 23-1915
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zachariah Dambrosia-Shaw
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Wakefield, Administrator, Lonoke County Jail, M. Dukes, #1718, Officer in Charge, Lonoke County Jail and Bowers, Deputy/Sheriff, Lonoke County Jail
Reginald Morgan v. David Duke
as 16-1787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald Morgan
Defendant - Appellee:
David Duke, Headless Confederates also known as KKK
James A. Butler v. Duke Terrell, et al
as 10-2541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James A. Butler
Defendant - Appellee:
Duke Terrell, Warden, Bureau of Prisons, Mail Room, Clerk of Court, 4th Circuit and others
Victor Villegas v. Duke Terrell, etc.
as 09-3251
Petitioner - Appellant:
Victor Villegas
Respondent - Appellee:
Duke Terrell, Warden
Victor Villegas v. Duke Terrell, etc.
as 09-3251
Petitioner / Appellant:
Victor Villegas
Respondent / Appellee:
Duke Terrell, Warden
James Ward v. Duke Terrell
as 09-1609
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Elliot Ward
Respondent - Appellee:
Duke Terrell, Warden
Stanley Slupkowski v. United States, et al
as 08-2742
Petitioner - Appellant:
Stanley A. Slupkowski
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America and Duke Terrell, Warden, FMC Rochester, MN
Jerry Emerson Martin v. Duke Terrell
as 08-1588
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jerry Emerson Martin
Respondent - Appellee:
Duke Terrell, Warden
Rickey Dukes v. City of Minneapolis, et al
as 08-1573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rickey Dukes
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Minneapolis, Officer Kelly O'Rourke, Officer Jeffrey Imming and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
