Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kyle Dalen v. Jodi Harpstead
as 24-1498
Plaintiff: Kyle Jerome Dalen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: Jodi Harpstead, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, in her individual and official capacities
Kenneth Daywitt, et al v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 24-1138
Plaintiff: Kenneth Daywitt, David James Jannetta, Steven Merrill Hogy and others
Defendant: Jodi Harpstead, DHS Commissioner; in their individual and official capacities, Marshall Smith, in their individual and official capacities, Nancy Johnston, in their individual and official capacities and others
Jeremy Mount v. J. Fikes, et al
as 24-1047
Plaintiff: Jeremy David Mount, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant: Warden J. Fikes, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of FCI Sandstone of PINE County, D. Drilling, individually and in his official capacities as correctional officer for the mail room of FCI-Sandstone PINE county and J. Best, individually and in his official capacities as Correctional Officer of FCI-Sandstone Mail Room of PINE County
James Rud, et al v. Nancy Johnston, et al
as 23-1577
Plaintiff / Appellee: James John Rud, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Brian K. Hausfeld, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: Nancy Johnston, Executive Director, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, in official capacity and Jodi Harpstead, Department of Human Services Commissioner, in official capacity
Kevin Karsjens, et al v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 22-1459
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kevin Scott Karsjens, and all others similarly situated, Kevin John DeVillion, and all others similarly situated, Peter Gerard Lonergan, and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jodi Harpstead, Kevin Moser, in their individual and official capacities, Peter Puffer and others
Kevin Scott Karsjens, et al v. Lucinda Jesson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3485
Plaintiff - Appellee: Kevin Scott Karsjens, David Leroy Gamble, Kevin John DeVillion and others
Defendant - Appellant: Lucinda Jesson, Kevin Moser, Peter Puffer and others
Jerome Bargo, et al v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 15-1984
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jerome Allen Bargo, and all other similarly situated inmates and Robert Harold Munnerlyn, and all other similarly situated inmates
Plaintiff: Marion Gene Westerman, and all other similarly situated inmates
Defendant - Appellee: Wendy Kelly, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Randall Watson, Warden, Varner Unit, Jeremy Andrews, Deputy Warden, Varner Unit and others
Kevin Scott Karsjens, et al v. Lucinda Jesson, et al
as 15-1500
Plaintiff - Appellee: Kevin Scott Karsjens, David Leroy Gamble, Kevin John DeVillion and others
Defendant - Appellant: Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Floyd Johnson-Bey v. Troy Steele, et al
as 11-2617
Plaintiff - Appellant: Floyd Lee Johnson-Bey
Defendant - Appellee: Troy Steele, Warden, PCC, George A. Lombardi, Director of the Department of Corrections, Steve Long, Director, Division of Probation and Parole and others
Ricky Rollins v. Matt Blunt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1122
Plaintiff: Ralph T. Wilmas, Jr. and John Doe, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ricky Rollins, Alex A. Mason, Cornelius Williams, Jr. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant: Alvin Dudley, Samuel Smith and Lonnie Wolford
Defendant - Appellee: Matt Blunt, Governor of Missouri, Official and Individual Capacity, Steve Long, Missouri Parole Board Chairman, Official and Individual Capacity, Wayne Crump, Parole Board Member, Official and Individual Capacity and others
Movant - Appellant: Nathan Roper

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?