Cases 11 - 20 of 1,212
Katie Rygmyr v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-2005
Plaintiff:
Katie Rygmyr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Jamila Reeves v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1977
Plaintiff:
Jamila Reeves
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Keith Washington v. Minnesota DOC, et al
as 24-1962
Plaintiff:
Keith Eugene Washington, also known as Monroe Bernard Washington
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Supervisor Officials, sued in their individual capacities, MCF Oak Park Heights, MCF Stillwater and others
Karen Littrell v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1923
Plaintiff:
Karen D. Littrell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Russell Lindquist v. Vicki Taylor, et al
as 24-1876
Plaintiff:
Russell Floyd Lindquist
Defendant:
Vicki Taylor, individually and officially as Assistant Chief Judge in Dakota County (DC), First Judicial District, Keith M. Ellison, officially as Minnesota Attorney General, Matt Smith, officially as DC Manager and others
Thomas Styczinski, et al v. Grace Arnold
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Styczinski, Tom "The Coin Guy", LLC, Treasure Island Coins, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Grace Arnold, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Commerce
Tammy Spader v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1683
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Spader
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Jose Gutierrez v. Jodi Harpstead
as 24-1658
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Gutierrez
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead, DHS Commissioner
Conmac Investments, Inc. v. CIR
as 24-1605
Petitioner:
Conmac Investments, Inc.
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
