Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Matthew Nagel, et al v. United Food and Com. Workers
as 22-1330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Matthew Nagel, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jessica Becklund, Sharon Brown, Pat Darling and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 653
Petitioner:
Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters and Food Handlers Pension Fund
Matthew Nagel, et al v. United Food and Com. Workers
as 22-1303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Nagel, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jessica Becklund, Sharon Brown, Pat Darling and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 653
Petitioner:
Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters and Food Handlers Pension Fund
Jacqui Jensen v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 21-3981
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jacqui Jensen
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Ricardo Morales, et al v. William P. Barr, et al
as 21-1183
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Jeffrey B. Jensen, U.S. Attorney General, Cole County Circuit Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ricardo Morales, Robert E. Campbell and Melvin Leroy Tyler
Plaintiff:
Vince C. Frazier
Curtis Abbott, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3636
Plaintiff / Appellee:
John Buzbee, Timothy Urtz, Christopher Sovey and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Anthony Dan v. Douglas County, et al
as 20-3548
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael W. Jensen, Prosecutor Attorney and Douglas County
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony T. Dan
Mohammed Siddiqui, et al v. ICE, et al
as 20-2762
Petitioner:
Sergio Gallego, Inemo Seimokuma Clement, Sauveur Victor and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Joel L. Brott, Sherburne County Sheriff, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Matthew Albence, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mohammed Siddiqui
Daniel Rassier, et al v. John Sanner, et al
as 20-1708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rita Rassier and Daniel A. Rassier
Defendant / Appellee:
Ken McDonald, Pam Jensen, Stearns County, Minnesota and others
James Jensen, et al v. MN Dept. of Human Services, et al
as 20-1399
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Darren Allen, as parents, guardians and next friends of Thomas M. Allbrink and others similarly situated, James Brinker, James Jensen and others
Defendant:
Director, Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Clinical Director, the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Douglas Bratvold, individually, and as Director of the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a progam of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and State of Minnesota
James Jensen, et al v. MN Dept. of Human Services, et al
as 20-1126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Darren Allen, as parents, guardians and next friends of Thomas M. Allbrink and others similarly situated, James Brinker, James Jensen and others
Defendant:
Director, Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Clinical Director, the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Douglas Bratvold, individually, and as Director of the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a progam of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and State of Minnesota
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
