Cases 41 - 50 of 74
United States v. Carl Watkin
as 14-2967
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Carl Watkins, also known as Yliyah Rephayah Ben Yisrayl
Ben Doud v. Toy Box Development Co., et al
as 14-2588
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ben Doud
Defendant - Appellant:
Toy Box Development Co., LLC, Michael Erickson and Michael Morse
Jacqueline Conners, et al v. Gusano's Chicago Style Pizzeri, et al
as 14-1829
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jacqueline L. Conners, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Rachel Hobbs, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Blaire Larson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gusano's Chicago Style Pizzeria, doing business as Kennedy's Pizzeria Inc., Catfish Pies Inc., Crazy Pies Inc. and others
Defendant:
Hendrix Brands Inc. and Timothy Chappell
Ben Purscell v. Tico Insurance Co., et al
as 13-2362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ben Purscell
Defendant - Appellee:
Tico Insurance Co. and Infinity Assurance Insurance, Company
Mark R. Becker, et al v. International Brotherhood
as 12-3846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark R. Becker, Richard G. Adams, Liphrino Alcenat and others
Defendant - Appellee:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 120
Ron Teague, et al v. Jim Cooper, et al
as 12-2418
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ron Teague, on and behalf of minor children T.T. and S. T., Kathy Teague, on and behalf of minor children T.T. and S. T. and Rhonda Richardson, on and behalf of minor child A.R.
Plaintiff:
Darrin Hardy, on and behalf of minor child C.H., Julie Hardy, on and behalf of minor child C.H., Mark Draper, on and behalf of minor children A.D. and S. D. and others
Defendant:
Arkansas Board of Education, Dr. Naccaman Williams, in his official capacity, Sherry Burrow, in her official capacity and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jim Cooper, in his official capacity, Brenda Gullett, in her official capacity, Samuel Ledbetter, in his official capacity and others
Ron Teague, et al v. Arkansas Board of Education, et al
as 12-2413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ron Teague, on and behalf of minor children T.T. and S. T., Kathy Teague, on and behalf of minor children T.T. and S. T. and Rhonda Richardson, on and behalf of minor child A.R.
Plaintiff:
Darrin Hardy, on and behalf of minor child C.H., Julie Hardy, on and behalf of minor child C.H., Mark Draper, on and behalf of minor children A.D. and S. D. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Board of Education, Jim Cooper, in his official capacity, Brenda Gullett, in her official capacity and others
Defendant:
Dr. Naccaman Williams, in his official capacity, Sherry Burrow, in her official capacity, White Hall School District and others
Donna Floyd-Gimon v. University of Arkansas, et al
as 12-1797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donna Floyd-Gimon
Defendant - Appellee:
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, by and through The Board of Trustees of The University of Arkansas, John Ed Anthony, in their official capacity as members of the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas, Carl Johnson, in their official capacity as members of the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas and others
Ben Scott, Jr. v. United State
as 11-3783
Petitioner - Appellant:
Ben Earnest Scott, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Professional Firefighters Asso, et al v. James C. Zalewski
as 11-3253
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Professional Firefighters Association of Omaha, Local 385, Omaha Police Officers Association, Local 101, Omaha Civilian Employees Association, Local 251 and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
Rick Bergholz, Mark Allen Lloyd, Stephen Bosilevac and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Omaha, a Municipal Corporation, Jim Suttle, Omaha Mayor, each in their official capacity, Ben Gray, Omaha City Council Member, each in their official capacity and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
James C. Zalewski
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
