Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-3282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mark Griffioen, et al v. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City etc., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-3170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Griffioen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joyce Ludvicek, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mike Ludvicek, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway Company, Alliant Energy Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
ASARCO v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-2830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASARCO, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah corporation
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Progress Rail Services Corp.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-2797
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant - Appellant:
Progress Rail Services Corporation
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Progress Rail Services Corp
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-2658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant - Appellee:
Progress Rail Services Corporation
Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gunderson Rail Service
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-2758
Plaintiff:
M. Randy Rice, as Trustee for Jody L. Clark
Defendant Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
Gunderson Rail Services LLC, doing business as Greenbrier Rail Services Pine Bluff, doing business as Gunderson Wheel Services, doing business as Gunderson, Inc.
Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gunderson Rail Service
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-2718
Plaintiff:
M. Randy Rice, as Trustee for Jody L. Clark
Defendant Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
Gunderson Rail Services LLC, doing business as Greenbrier Rail Services Pine Bluff, doing business as Gunderson Wheel Services, doing business as Gunderson, Inc.
Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gunderson Rail Service
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-2627
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M. Randy Rice, as Trustee for Jody L. Clark
Defendant Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
Gunderson Rail Services LLC, doing business as Greenbrier Rail Services Pine Bluff, doing business as Gunderson Wheel Services, doing business as Gunderson, Inc.
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. U.S.Dept. of Homeland Security, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-2143
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Department of Homeland Security and Janet Napolitano, in her official capacity
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.