Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States v. Aaron Clark
as 23-2119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Aaron J. Clark, also known as Aaron Barfield
Michael Biffle, et al v. Sho-Me Power Electric, etc., et al
as 15-2964
Plaintiff:
Chase Barfield, J. Carol Hutchens and Rowena Hutchens
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Michael D. Biffle, Gina Biffle and Dwight K. Robertson
Defendant - Appellant:
Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative and Sho-Me Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. and K-PowerNet, LLC
Chase Barfield, et al v. KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc, et al
as 13-8026
Respondent:
Chase Barfield, Michael D. Biffle, Gina Biffle and others
:
Show-Me Power Electric Cooperative and Show-Me Technologies, LLC
Petitioner:
KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. and K-PowerNet, LLC
Chase Barfield, et al v. Sho-Me Power Electric, etc., et al
as 13-8025
Respondent:
Chase Barfield, Michael D. Biffle, Gina Biffle and others
Petitioner:
Show-Me Power Electric Cooperative and Show-Me Technologies, LLC
:
KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. and K-PowerNet, LLC
Bong H. Chae v. Jackie L. Bennett
as 13-6041
Debtor:
In re: Jackie L. Bennett, also known as Jackie L. Haymon, also known as Jackie L. Barfield
Creditor - Appellant:
Bong H. Chae
Debtor - Appellee:
Jackie L. Bennett
Robert Barfield v. John Ault, et al
as 10-1847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Barfield
Defendant - Appellee:
John Ault, Charles Harper, Dave DeGrange and others
Willie Barfield v. New Birth Home
as 08-1057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Willie D. Barfield
Defendant - Appellee:
New Birth Home
Charles Williams v. City of Carl Junction, et al
as 07-2704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles E. Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Carl Junction, Missouri, James "Jim" Wisdom, Mayor, City of Carl Junction, In his individual and official capacities, John Hofer, Chief of Police, City of Carl Junction, In his individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
