Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Barry London v. Brush-Strode, et al
as 23-3607
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Barry D. London
Defendant / Appellee:
Brush-Strode, Psychologist, Ouachita River Correctional Unit, Shana D. Brink, Nurse, North Central Unit, ADC, R. Hicks, Sgt., North Central Unit, ADC and others
Adam Hill v. Sarah Crawford, et al
as 23-1633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
Sarah Crawford, Nurse and Carol Johnson, Sergeant, Grimes Unit, ADC
Defendant:
Marjorie Hall, Health Administrator, Correctional Care Solutions, Susan Hutson, Director of Nursing, Correctional Care Solutions, Sarah Brewer, Nurse, Correctional Care Solutions and others
Radai Mendez Dominguez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-2589
Petitioner:
Radai Obed Mendez Dominguez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
United States v. Rodrigo Rodriguez-Mendez
as 22-2399
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rodrigo Rodriguez-Mendez
Raphael Mendez v. FMC Rochester, et al
as 22-2248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant / Appellee:
FMC Rochester, Minnesota, Mr. Beadling, Correctional Officer, Steve Kallis, Warden, SiS and others
United States v. Rafeal Mendez
as 22-1984
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rafeal Isaac Mendez
Raphael Mendez v. Susan Richard Nelson
as 22-1435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Susan Richard Nelson, et al
United States v. Felipe Mendez, Jr.
as 22-1349
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Felipe Mendez, Jr.
Raphael Mendez v. FMC Rochester, et al
as 22-1203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant / Appellee:
FMC Rochester, Steve Kallis, Minnesota Warden, Minnesota Commissary Sales Section, et al and others
Lucio Guzman-Mendez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3495
Petitioner:
Lucio Arturo Guzman-Mendez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
