Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Moore et al v. St. Louis, Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2009cv02053
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore, Kelly Owens, Anita Keely and others
Defendant:
St. Louis, Missouri, City of, St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, Todd Epsten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Automotive Industry et al
as 4:2009cv01772
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dewayne Moore
Defendant:
Automotive Industry, Lamborghini, Lexus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Moore v. Beauvais Manor on the Park
as 4:2009cv00772
Plaintiff:
Lee George Moore
Defendant:
Beauvais Manor on the Park
Cause Of Action: M
Winston v. St. Louis County Justice Services et al
as 4:2008cv01476
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Don'Virgil Winston
Defendant:
St. Louis County Justice Services, Roy Mueller, Julia Childrey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberts et al v. Conley et al
as 4:2008cv01330
Plaintiff:
Curtis Roberts and Betty Labigang
Defendant:
Elizabeth Conley, Glen Babich, Jim Moore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberts et al v. Conley et al
as 2:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Curtis Roberts and Betty Labigang
Defendant:
Elizabeth Conley, Glen Babich, Jim Moore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberts et al v. Conley et al
as 2:2008cv00045
Plaintiff:
Curtis Roberts and Betty Labigang
Defendant:
Elizabeth Conley, Glen Babich, Jim Moore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ricky E. Moore v. City of Desloge, et al.,
as 4:2008cv01200
Plaintiff:
Ricky E. Moore
Defendant:
John Doe, 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: O
Harris v. Hensly et al
as 4:2007cv01905
Plaintiff:
Emil Harris
Defendant:
Robert L. Hensley, Etheria Thompson, Lewis McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
