Cases 101 - 110 of 51,137
Gounaris v. Ascension Health
as 4:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
George Gounaris
Defendant:
Ascension Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Skaggs v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Micheal Lee Skaggs
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otte v. Morriss
as 4:2024cv00712
Petitioner:
Shawn Otte
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copeland LP v. Thurston et al
as 4:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
COPELAND LP
Defendant:
DOUG THURSTON and DELTATRAK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Feuerborn v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Daniel Feuerborn
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Gartner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Carrie Gartner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hoechst Farms, Inc. v. MO Cold Logistics, LLC
as 4:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Hoechst Farms, Inc.
Defendant:
MO Cold Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Gufler v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Gufler
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Perficient, Inc. v. Crushbank Technology, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Perficient, Inc.
Defendant:
Crushbank Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
