Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Houston v. Stange
as 4:2019cv02545
Petitioner:
Michael J. Houston
Respondent:
William (Bill) Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lam v. Parks et al
as 1:2019cv00138
Defendant:
Steven N. Pelton, Abbie Shirrell, County of Franklin (Franklin County Sheriff's Department/County Jail) and others
Plaintiff:
James Lam, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lam v. Finn et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Ofc. Greg Palovick, Ofc. Unknown Allen, Stephan Lawhorn and others
Plaintiff:
James Lam, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. McKinney et al
as 4:2019cv01901
Defendant:
Travis Crews, William D. McKinney, R. Savage and others
Plaintiff:
Damon Josiah Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kassimali et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Maureen Kassimali , Luz Marie Alvarez , Adriana Arango and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houston v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02436
Plaintiff:
Neal Houston
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., William McKinney, Diane Larkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01855
Plaintiff:
Vickie Forrest , Christine Adams , Katherine Allen and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Novy et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01233
Plaintiff:
Angela Novy , Frederick Becker , Larry Collins and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houston v. USA
as 4:2016cv01042
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shamir Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Purkey v. USA
as 1:2016cv00137
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Houston Purkey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.