Cases 81 - 90 of 51,202
Harris v. 22nd Judicial Circuit City of St. Louis Circuit Court
as 4:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Desmond Harris
Defendant:
22nd Judicial Circuit City of St. Louis Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whalen v. Southeast Correctional Center et al
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Deion A. Whalen, Sr.
Defendant:
Southeast Correctional Center, Bill Stange, Lorainne Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaiser v. Saint Luke's Health System, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Vicki Kaiser
Defendant:
Saint Luke's Health System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Powers v. USA
as 4:2024cv00774
Petitioner:
Naquan Powers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Duncan v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00778
Petitioner:
Barrett N. Duncan
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dietz v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Larry B. Dietz
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Yetman et al
as 4:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Cook
Defendant:
Officer M. Yetman, A. Shumate and St. Francois County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
