Prison Condition Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 51 - 60 of 134
Woods v. Todd et al
as 2:2017cv04117
Plaintiff: Darrell Woods
Defendant: Matthew Todd, John Gerke, Romelle Blackmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Fulton Reception & Diagnostic Correctional Center et al
as 2:2017cv04086
Plaintiff: Brandon S Warren
Defendant: Fulton Reception & Diagnostic Correctional Center, FRDCC Medical Director and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rauch v. Denney et al
as 5:2017cv06053
Plaintiff: Michael Eugene Rauch
Defendant: Larry Denney, Dorsch, Corizon Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanan v. O'Connell et al
as 6:2017cv03053
Plaintiff: Steven Tyler Buchanan
Defendant: Brian O'Connell , Gary Fuwell , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-Mu Min aka James Lenoir v. Cassady et al
as 2:2017cv04017
Plaintiff: Shyheim Deen El-Mu Min aka James Lenoir
Defendant: Jay Cassady, Matthew Newman, Caleb Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Pash et al
as 5:2016cv06146
Plaintiff: William Wintworth Foster
Defendant: Ronda J. Pash, John Doe and Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deatherage v. Spears et al
as 3:2016cv05114
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Don Deatherage
Defendant: John Spears, Jim Arnott, Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piel v. Arnott et al
as 6:2016cv03416
Plaintiff: Jason Thomas Piel
Defendant: Jim Arnott, Dodson, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Minor et al
as 4:2016cv00962
Plaintiff: David Leonard
Defendant: Dean Minor, Moberly Correctional Center, Corizon LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sipp v. Denney et al
as 2:2016cv04227
Plaintiff: Walter C Sipp
Defendant: Larry Denney , Todd Warren , Dana Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?