Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Urban v. Warden Blair
as 2:2023cv04070
Petitioner:
Joshua Robert Urban
Respondent:
Warden Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King et al v. Udoji-Eddings et al
as 6:2022cv03314
Petitioner:
Conservator Mark King, Mercy Udoji, Esther Udoji and others
Plaintiff:
Felicia O Udoji, Timothy Udoji and Mark King
Not Classified By Court:
Gary Temple
Guardian Ad Litem:
Karl Warden
Defendant:
Felicia Udoji-Eddings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Killy v. Warden Gomez
as 2:2022cv04118
Petitioner:
Alex Platzer Killy
Respondent:
Warden Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trent-Kettlekamp v. Vandergriff
as 2:2022cv04096
Petitioner:
Bailey Trent-Kettlekamp
Respondent:
Warden David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nailor v. Buckner et al
as 6:2021cv03205
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Nailor
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Anne L. Precythe, Warden Jeff Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Smith
as 6:2021cv03154
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Smith, Sr.
Respondent:
M.D. Smith and Warden J.E. Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eggemeyer v. Corizon et al
as 2:2021cv04091
Plaintiff:
Nathan A Eggemeyer
Defendant:
Michael L. Parsons, Rue, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warden et al v. City of Kansas City, Missouri
as 4:2020cv00995
Plaintiff:
Steve Wicks, Danny Shook, Gary Brown and others
Defendant:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Toole v. Smith
as 6:2020cv03409
Respondent:
Michael Smith and Warden Jeff Krueger
Petitioner:
Algernon Toole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hiscox Insurance Company Inc. et al v. Warden Grier, LLP
as 4:2020cv00237
Plaintiff:
Hiscox Insurance Company Inc. and Hiscox Syndicates Limited
Defendant:
Warden Grier, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
