Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Bey v. Evergy Metro Inc, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Marquette Lumumba Mugabe Bey
Defendant:
Evergy Metro Inc, Missouri, Spire Energy, KC Water and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Clay County Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
Clay County, Missouri and Clay County Commission
Blankenship v. T-Mobile Central LLC
as 4:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hebert Blankenship
Defendant:
T-Mobile Central LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Lopez et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
David Lopez and Jerome Cascio
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA Inc and T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Polhill et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Edward Polhill and Steven Vash
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Smith v. T-Mobile US Inc
as 4:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Richard Smith
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
