Cases 141 - 150 of 3,062
Jonathan Riches, et al v. X-Men Inc., et al
as 10-6069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Movant - Appellant:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON, RICHARD GALIETTI, SHANNON LEE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
X-MEN INC., et al.
Jonathan Riches v. John Doe
as 10-14040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, a.k.a. Secured Party
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE
Riches v. Hughes et al
as 1:2010cv02119
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Amanda Hughes, Kristen Hungness, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riches v. 62nd Annual Emmy Awards et al
as 1:2010cv02117
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
62nd Annual Emmy Awards, Amy Poehler, Will Arnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riches v. Polizzi et al
as 1:2010cv02109
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches doing business as Bernard Madoff also known as Faisal Shahzad and Faisal Shahzad
Defendant:
Nicole Polizzi other Snooki doing business as Jersey Shore, Paul Delvecchio, Mike Sorrentino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Disick et al
as 1:2010cv02115
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches also known as Faisal Shahzad doing business as Bernard L. Madoff and Faisal Shahzad
Defendant:
Scott Disick, Kourtney Kardashian, Khloe Kardashian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Saban et al
as 1:2010cv02088
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Nick Saban, Urban Meyer, Joe Paterno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riches v. New York Yankees, The et al
as 1:2010cv02087
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
New York Yankees, The, Derek Jeter, Alex Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Patridge et al
as 1:2010cv02090
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Audrina Patridge and Amanda Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
