Cases 31 - 40 of 3,342
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Uwazurike et al v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Eyioma Uwazurike, Noah Shannon, Nelson Brands and others
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Iowa Department of Public Safety, Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Roe et al v. East Sac County Community School District et al
as 5:2024cv04015
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe and John Doe
Defendant:
East Sac County Community School District, Jeffrey Kruse and Kevin R Litterer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Aloula v. Randall et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Atabonam Aloula and Atabanam Aloula
Defendant:
Shelly Randall, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
