Cases 51 - 60 of 5,683
Cook v. Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
as 0:2024cv01535
Petitioner:
David James Cook, SR
Respondent:
Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perkins v. Daniels et al
as 0:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Dr. Jack Daniels and Dr. Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debenedetto v. Ford et al
as 0:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
Mr Ford, RN. Officer Davidson, Associate Warden Mells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2024cv00962
Petitioner:
Cederic Lamont Berry and Cedric Lamont Berry
Respondent:
Tim Walz and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horswell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv00949
Petitioner:
Phillip Harold Horswell
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mangum v. Beltz et al
as 0:2024cv01505
Petitioner:
Leonard Mangum
Respondent:
Tracy Beltz and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berumen v. Segal et al
as 0:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Irene Berumen
Defendant:
Michael Segal, L. Linder, Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fortner v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01496
Petitioner:
Anthony Fortner
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keita v. Huckell et al
as 0:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Mamady Kalifa Keita
Defendant:
Scott Huckell, Matthew Russell, Jonanthan C. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv00594
Petitioner:
Albert C. Burgess, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
