Miller Act Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Nucor Harris Rebar Midwest, LLC v. United Rebar, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00714
Plaintiff: Nucor Harris Rebar Midwest, LLC and United States of America, for the use and benefit of Nucor Harris Rebar Midwest, LLC
Defendant: United Rebar, Inc., United Ironworkers, Inc., Travelers Casualty & Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
PN Holdings, LLC v. Lam Support Services, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00080
Defendant: Lam Support Services, LLC, Ice Technical Services Incorporated, Federal Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: PN Holdings, LLC doing business as Unlimited Innovations and PN Holdings, LLC on behalf of itself, Quit Tam Plaintiff on behalf the United States of America doing business as Unlimited Innovations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
Hendrick Manufacturing Company et al v. McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01579
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hendrick Manufacturing Company and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
Omaha Electric Service Inc. v. L.S. Black Constructors, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00024
Defendant: Fedearl Insurance Company, Loeffel Construction, Loeffel Engstrand Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Omaha Electric Service and Omaha Electric Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00004
Plaintiff: United States of America and H.M.E., Inc.
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Federal Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Federal Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00251
Defendant: DTREDS LLC and Federal Insurance Company
Plaintiff: KW Boring, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Butler Supply, Inc. v. Power & Data, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv01796
Plaintiff: Butler Supply, Inc.
Defendant: Power & Data, LLC , Federal Insurance Company, Jeffrey Malks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Metro Air Conditioning Co. v. Federal Insurance Company et al
as 6:2011cv00647
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Metro Air Conditioning Co.
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Allied Construction Services, Inc. v. Allied Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv03171
Plaintiff: Allied Construction Services, Inc.
Defendant: Watts-Weitz, A Joint Venture , Federal Insurance Company , Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Allied Construction Services, Inc. et al v. Watts-Weitz, A Joint Venture et al
as 6:2011cv03173
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Allied Construction Services, Inc. and Allied Construction Services, Inc.
Defendant: Watts-Weitz, A Joint Venture, Federal Insurance Company, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?