Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Lamming v. Prestige Maintenance USA, Ltd. et al
as 4:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Andrew P. Lamming
Defendant:
Prestige Maintenance USA, Ltd. , Prestige Maintenance USA Janitorial Supply, LLC , Sifredo E. Ramirez Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olson v. Lortz
as 4:2014cv04140
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Olson
Defendant:
Harry P. Lortz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheppard v. Joker Limited Group et al.
as 4:2013cv02521
Plaintiff:
Tracy Sheppard
Defendant:
Joker Limited Group and Virgino P. Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodruff v. Casey's Service Company
as 6:2013cv03268
Plaintiff:
Julie P. Woodruff
Defendant:
Casey's Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodruff v. Casey's Service Company
as 4:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
Julie P. Woodruff
Defendant:
Casey's Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Urias et al v. Muellerleile et al
as 3:2013cv03016
Plaintiff:
Cesar Gabriel Urias and Jose Urias
Defendant:
David J Muellerleile , Penske Truck Leasing Co L P , Merco Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Smith. et al., v. Bush et al.,
as 4:2012cv00469
Defendant:
Roberts Dairy Company, L.L.C. and Joseph A. Bush
Plaintiff:
Adam P. Smith , Laura M. Smith and Micah P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Adams et al v. Orr et al
as 3:2012cv03025
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Adams , Jamie J. Adams , Virginia Adams and others
Defendant:
Daniel Edward Orr and Watkins and Shepard Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Roadway Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tami A. Wells
Defendant:
Roadway Express, Inc. and Edward P. Micaletti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilburn v. YRC, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Wilburn
Defendant:
YRC, Inc. and Edward P. Micaletti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
