Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Mead et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mead and Karrie Mead
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Aaron M. Jones
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0056 Employers Liability Act - Personal Inj re Railroads (bringing an action)
Courtois v. Union Pacific Corporation
as 4:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Anthony Courtois
Defendant:
Union Pacific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Armstrong v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2021cv04209
Plaintiff:
Shawn Armstrong
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Pohle v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2021cv00317
Plaintiff:
Tess Pohle
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0056
Sprinkel v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
Angela Sprinkel
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 5:2021cv06069
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, William Lamar Woodward and Richard Louis Alsbury
Plaintiff:
Judith Ann Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Runkle v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Austin Elkins, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Reyna Stevens and Randall Runkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harmon v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 0:2020cv02235
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HARMON
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
