Cases 111 - 120 of 2,566
Brown v. Fairhaven Financial Advisory Corporation
as 0:2023cv01493
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Fairhaven Financial Advisory Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Tomford et al
as 0:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Travis Tomford, Jay H Lucas and NuWay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Lucas et al
as 0:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Jay H Lucas, North Shore Forensic Psychology, Dr. Travis Tomford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Atkinson et al
as 0:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Samantha R Atkinson, Brittney Swenson and Cassie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Krueger v. Nebraska et al
as 4:2023cv04081
Plaintiff:
Tommy Eugene Krueger
Defendant:
Nebraska, Connie Krueger, Kerri Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Brown v. Smith
as 0:2023cv01391
Plaintiff:
Shawn Christopher Brown
Defendant:
Cassie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Gosling
as 0:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Shawn Christopher Brown
Defendant:
Aaron Gosling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Gorr
as 0:2023cv01389
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Sarah Garr and Sarah Gorr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Swenson
as 0:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Brittney Swenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joshua Lapin v. EverQuote, et al
as 23-2184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua A. Lapin
Defendant / Appellee:
EverQuote, Inc., also known as EverQuote and John Doe, Sender, doing business as BuzzBarrelReview.com, doing business as dzlosurverys.com, doing business as emails-jobsdelivered.com, doing business as Entirelybelieve.com, doing business as JobsDeliver.com, doing business as expectcarecare.com,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
