Cases 31 - 40 of 1,592
Meyer Automotive, Inc. v. Kolterman et al
as 4:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Meyer Automotive, Inc.
Defendant:
Jessica Kolterman, Brian Peters, John Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belcastro Gonzalez v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Katherine Belcastro Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of Omaha and Todd Schmaderer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ajang v. Ajackog
as 8:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Tipkwan Ajawin Ajang
Defendant:
Mrs Tabitha Andrew Ajackog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jurgens v. City of Omaha
as 8:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Linda Jurgens
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Barfield-Peak v. Rudolph
as 8:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Terrijana Barfield-Peak
Defendant:
Angie Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. National Action Network Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rogers
Defendant:
National Action Network Inc., Alfred Charles Sharpton, Jr., Peter Joseph Gleason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sipple v. Kramer et al
as 4:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Adam T Sipple
Defendant:
Deputy Roland Kramer and Devin Ruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Grammys Awards on CBS
as 4:2024cv03005
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Grammys Awards on CBS doing business as The Recording Academy/National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences (NARAS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zika v. Calvert et al
as 4:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
Garry Zika
Defendant:
Christopher Calvert and Matthew Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber v. Doe 1 et al
as 8:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
RaySean Barber
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
